TOKYO, Feb. 13, 2013 — Ricoh today detailed its participation in the Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) program, the definitive global registry for greener electronics (www.epeat.net/). For the past three years, Ricoh has worked with EPEAT and other stakeholders to develop 59 definitive environmental criteria for Imaging Equipment. Today, the EPEAT registry expanded to include devices such as printers, copiers, multi-function products and other equipment.
EPEAT is a comprehensive green purchasing standard based upon environmental design attributes, such as, energy efficiency, recycled and recyclable materials, product longevity, packaging, and environmental programs a manufacturer has in place. EPEAT provides purchasers the capability to easily compare environmental performance and practices of various manufacturers in a standardized format.
As of today, Ricoh has 18 Gold, 43 Silver, and 1 Bronze-rated products in the United States with many more products to come (*1), exemplifying its commitment to global leadership in environmental sustainability and the partnership with its customers.
"I applaud Ricoh for registering such a diverse range of products in EPEAT's new Imaging Equipment category," said Robert Frisbee, EPEAT CEO. "Ricoh's proactive decision to embrace the EPEAT standards shows their commitment to environmental excellence across their product lines."
Ricoh has earned environmental labels in every region of the world, such as the Blue Angel mark (Germany) and the Eco-Mark (Japan) offering its customers environmentally certified products. The EPEAT is regarded as one of the indispensable evaluations not only to satisfy the requirements for supply of the U.S. federal government, but also to offer environmentally satisfactory products globally.
(*1) For the most recent list of Ricoh's EPEAT-rated products, please visit http://ww2.epeat.net/searchoptions.aspx
To be added to the EPEAT Bronze registry, an imaging device must meet at least 33 required environmental performance criteria. Products may achieve higher Silver and Gold ratings by meeting up to 26 additional optional criteria. The rating criteria were developed during a four-year stakeholder consensus process that involved hundreds of representatives from the environmental, research, governmental and manufacturing sectors.
According to EPEAT: